Structural Equation Modelling to Identify Psychometric Determinants of Medication Adherence in a Survey of Kidney Dialysis Patients.

Purpose: Medication non-adherence in dialysis patients is associated with increased mortality and higher healthcare costs. We assessed whether medication adherence is influenced by specific psychometric constructs measuring beliefs about the necessity for medication and concerns about them. We also tested whether medication knowledge, health literacy, and illness perceptions influenced this relationship. Patients and Methods: This study is based on data from a cross-sectional in-person questionnaire, administered to a random sample of all adult dialysis patients at a teaching hospital. The main outcome was self-assessed medication adherence (8-Item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale). The predictors were: concerns about medications and necessity for medication (Beliefs About Medication Questionnaire); health literacy; medication knowledge (Medication Knowledge Evaluation Tool); cognitive, emotional, and comprehensibility Illness perceptions (Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire). Path analysis was performed using structural equations in both covariance and variance-based models. Results: Necessity for medication increased (standardized path coefficient [ß] 0.30 [95% CI 0.05, 0.54]) and concerns about medication decreased (standardized ß -0.33 [-0.57, -0.09]) medication adherence, explaining most of the variance in outcome (r2=0.95). Medication knowledge and cognitive illness perceptions had no effects on medication adherence, either directly or indirectly. Higher health literacy, greater illness comprehension, and a more positive emotional view of their illness had medium-to-large sized effects in increasing medication adherence. These were indirect rather and direct effects mediated by decreases in concerns about medications (standardized ß respectively -0.40 [-0.63,-0.16], -0.60 [-0.85, -0.34], -0.33 [-0.52, -0.13]). Conclusion: Interventions that reduce patients' concerns about their medications are likely to improve adherence, rather than interventions that increase patients' perceived necessity for medication. Improving patients' general health literacy and facilitating a better understanding and more positive perception of the illness can probably achieve this. Our study is potentially limited by a lack of generalizability outside of the population and setting in which it was conducted.

Effect of Dialysate and Plasma Sodium on Mortality in a Global Historical Hemodialysis Cohort.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This large observational cohort study aimed to investigate the relationship between dialysate and plasma sodium concentrations and mortality among maintenance hemodialysis patients. Using a large multinational cohort of 68,196 patients, we found that lower dialysate sodium concentrations (≤138 mmol/L) were independently associated with higher mortality compared with higher dialysate sodium concentrations (>138 mmol/L). The risk of death was lower among patients exposed to higher dialysate sodium concentrations, regardless of plasma sodium levels. These results challenge the prevailing assumption that lower dialysate sodium concentrations improve outcomes in hemodialysis patients. The study confirms that until robust evidence from randomized trials that are underway is available, nephrologists should remain cautious in reconsideration of dialysate sodium prescribing practices to optimize cardiovascular outcomes and reduce mortality in this population. BACKGROUND: Excess mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients is largely due to cardiovascular disease and is associated with abnormal fluid status and plasma sodium concentrations. Ultrafiltration facilitates the removal of fluid and sodium, whereas diffusive exchange of sodium plays a pivotal role in sodium removal and tonicity adjustment. Lower dialysate sodium may increase sodium removal at the expense of hypotonicity, reduced blood volume refilling, and intradialytic hypotension risk. Higher dialysate sodium preserves blood volume and hemodynamic stability but reduces sodium removal. In this retrospective cohort, we aimed to assess whether prescribing a dialysate sodium ≤138 mmol/L has an effect on survival outcomes compared with dialysate sodium >138 mmol/L after adjusting for plasma sodium concentration. METHODS: The study population included incident HD patients from 875 Fresenius Medical Care Nephrocare clinics in 25 countries between 2010 and 2019. Baseline dialysate sodium (≤138 or >138 mmol/L) and plasma sodium (<135, 135-142, >142 mmol/L) concentrations defined exposure status. We used multivariable Cox regression model stratified by country to model the association between time-varying dialysate and plasma sodium exposure and all-cause mortality, adjusted for demographic and treatment variables, including bioimpedance measures of fluid status. RESULTS: In 2,123,957 patient-months from 68,196 incident HD patients with on average three HD sessions per week dialysate sodium of 138 mmol/L was prescribed in 63.2%, 139 mmol/L in 15.8%, 140 mmol/L in 20.7%, and other concentrations in 0.4% of patients. Most clinical centers (78.6%) used a standardized concentration. During a median follow-up of 40 months, one third of patients ( n =21,644) died. Dialysate sodium ≤138 mmol/L was associated with higher mortality (multivariate hazard ratio for the total population (1.57, 95% confidence interval, 1.25 to 1.98), adjusted for plasma sodium concentrations and other confounding variables. Subgroup analysis did not show any evidence of effect modification by plasma sodium concentrations or other patient-specific variables. CONCLUSIONS: These observational findings stress the need for randomized evidence to reliably define optimal standard dialysate sodium prescribing practices.

Simplified calculation of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis rate: Accuracy of a recently developed estimating equation.

Recently, we validated a simple method for estimating peritoneal dialysis (PD) peritonitis rate. Despite good agreement between estimates and gold-standard measurements in two large dialysis registries, the International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) was hesitant to recommend adoption of the estimating equation. Their perception is that inaccuracies, as small as they are, might still be detrimental to clinical decision-making. In this study, we apply new analyses to the original validation data sets. We quantify agreement using standards from the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). We also identify a subset of centres with poorest performance of the estimating equation and qualitatively assess the potential for compromised clinical decision-making associated with its use. Inter-assay % coefficient of variation between estimates and measurements was 4.2% in the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry and 4.6% in Le Registre de Dialyse Péritonéale de Langue Française, easily meeting ISO requirements. Mandel's h values and Grubb's tests confirmed more outlying estimates compared to the measurements, while Mandel's k values and Cochran's C tests showed that identical precision by the two methods. Misclassification of centres as being above versus below the ISPD standard of 0.4 episodes/patient-year occurred only with rates close to the threshold, affecting approximately 3% of patient-years. In the 26 (out of 268) centres with poorest performance of the estimating equation, examination of the time series of their annual PD peritonitis rate estimates/measurements showed that using estimates would not detrimental to clinical decision-making. In conclusion, the estimating equation is sufficiently accurate for routine clinical use.

A systematic review of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis rates over time from national or regional population-based registries and databases.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis is one of the top priorities for care and research among PD stakeholders. This study summarizes PD peritonitis rates from available population-based national or regional registries around the world, examining trends over time. This is a systematic review of PD peritonitis rates in patients treated with PD for kidney failure, from census-based national or provincial/statewide/provider registries or databases. MEDLINE (via PubMed) was searched from inception to August 2020, and inquiries made to national registry personnel using the International Comparisons section of the 2018 United States Renal Data System Annual Data Report as a contact list. Quantitative synthesis was done using weighted random-effects Poisson regression. Of 81 countries that reported utilization of PD, 19 did not have a traditional dialysis registry (governed by either professional societies or government entities), and only 33 monitored PD peritonitis rates correctly and accessibly. There is wide variation in PD peritonitis rates between countries, although the global average has been decreasing over time, from 0.600 episodes/patient-year in 1992 to 0.303 in 2019. Other sources of variability include the continent in which the country is nested and the size of its PD population. PD peritonitis, despite its importance for PD stakeholders, is under-monitored. While the global rate is decreasing over time, the presence and extent of this improvement varies from country to country. There is an opportunity for better monitoring, research into underachieving and overachieving nations and development of international clinical support networks.

Mortality, hospitalization and transfer to haemodialysis and hybrid therapy, in Japanese peritoneal dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Survival of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients in Japan is high, but few reports exist on cause-specific mortality, transfer to haemodialysis (HD) or hybrid dialysis and hospitalisation risks. We aimed to identify reasons for transfer to HD, hybrid dialysis and hospitalisation in the Japan Peritoneal Dialysis and Outcomes Practice Patterns Study. METHODS: This observational study included 808 adult PD patients across 31 facilities in Japan in 2014-2017. Information on all-cause and cause-specific mortality and hospitalisation and permanent transfer to HD and PD/HD hybrid therapy were prospectively collected and rates calculated. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 1.66 years where 162 patients transferred to HD, 79 transferred to hybrid dialysis and 74 patients died. All-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related mortality rates were 5.1 and 1.7 deaths/100 patient-years, respectively. Rates of transfer to HD and hybrid therapy were 11.2 and 5.5 transfers/100 patient-years, respectively. Among HD transfers, 40% were due to infection (including peritonitis), while 20% were due to inadequate solute/water clearance. Eighty-one percent of hybrid dialysis transfers were due to inadequate solute/water clearance. All--cause, peritonitis-related and CVD-related hospitalisation rates were 120.4, 21.1 and 15.6/100 patient-years, respectively. Median hospital length of stay was 19 days. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality, hospitalisation and transfer to HD/hybrid dialysis rates are relatively low in Japan compared to many other countries with hybrid transfers, accounting for one-third of dialysis transfers from PD. Further study is needed to explain the high inter-facility variation in hospitalisation rates and how to further reduce hospitalisation rates for Japanese PD patients.

Home Versus Facility Dialysis and Mortality in Australia and New Zealand.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Mortality is an important outcome for all dialysis stakeholders. We examined associations between dialysis modality and mortality in the modern era. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study comparing dialysis inception cohorts 1998-2002, 2003-2007, 2008-2012, and 2013-2017. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) dialysis population. EXPOSURE: The primary exposure was dialysis modality: facility hemodialysis (HD), continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), automated PD (APD), or home HD. OUTCOME: The main outcome was death. ANALYTICAL METHODS: Cause-specific proportional hazards models with shared frailty and subdistribution proportional hazards (Fine and Gray) models, adjusting for available confounding covariates. RESULTS: In 52,097 patients, the overall death rate improved from ~15 deaths per 100 patient-years in 1998-2002 to ~11 in 2013-2017, with the largest cause-specific contribution from decreased infectious death. Relative to facility HD, mortality with CAPD and APD has improved over the years, with adjusted hazard ratios in 2013-2017 of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.78-0.99) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.82-1.00), respectively. Increasingly, patients with lower clinical risk have been adopting APD, and to a lesser extent CAPD. Relative to facility HD, mortality with home HD was lower throughout the entire period of observation, despite increasing adoption by older patients and those with more comorbidities. All effects were generally insensitive to the modeling approach (initial vs time-varying modality, cause-specific versus subdistribution regression), different follow-up time intervals (5 year vs 7 year vs 10 year). There was no effect modification by diabetes, comorbidity, or sex. LIMITATIONS: Potential for residual confounding, limited generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: The survival of patients on PD in 2013-2017 appears greater than the survival for patients on facility HD in ANZ. Additional research is needed to assess whether changing clinical risk profiles over time, varied dialysis prescription, and morbidity from dialysis access contribute to these findings.

Relationship between measured and prescribed dialysate sodium in haemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Dialysate sodium (DNa) prescription policy differs between haemodialysis (HD) units, and the optimal DNa remains uncertain. We sought to summarize the evidence on the agreement between prescribed and delivered DNa, and whether the relationship varied according to prescribed DNa. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and PubMed from inception to 26 February 2020 for studies reporting measured and prescribed DNa. We analysed results reported in aggregate with random-effects meta-analysis. We analysed results reported by individual sample, using mixed-effects Bland-Altman analysis and linear regression. Pre-specified subgroup analyses included method of sodium measurement, dialysis machine manufacturer and proportioning method. RESULTS: Seven studies, representing 908 dialysate samples from 10 HD facilities (range 16-133 samples), were identified. All but one were single-centre studies. Studies were of low to moderate quality. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference between measured and prescribed DNa {mean difference = 0.73 mmol/L [95% confidence interval (CI) -1.12 to 2.58; P = 0.44]} but variability across studies was substantial (I2 = 99.3%). Among individually reported samples (n = 295), measured DNa was higher than prescribed DNa by 1.96 mmol/L (95% CI 0.23-3.69) and the 95% limits of agreement ranged from -3.97 to 7.88 mmol/L. Regression analysis confirmed a strong relationship between prescribed and measured DNa, with a slope close to 1:1 (ß = 1.16, 95% CI 1.06-1.27; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A limited number of studies suggest that, on average, prescribed and measured DNa are similar. However, between- and within-study differences were large. Further consideration of the precision of delivered DNa is required to inform rational prescribing.

Temporal changes in dialysate [Na+] prescription from 1996 to 2018 and their clinical significance as judged from a meta-regression of clinical trials.

Over the last two decades, the clinical care of dialysis patients has refocused sharply on fluid volume control. Dialysate [Na+] is a key, albeit under-investigated, clinical tool for manipulation of fluid volume on dialysis. In the article, we firstly use data from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study to document the global decrease in dialysate [Na+] that has occurred from 1996 to 2018, and demonstrate the virtual disappearance of [Na+] profiling from routine dialysis practice over the same period. Second, we used data from previously synthesized randomized clinical trial evidence combined with that of a more recently published trail to assess the clinical significance of these changes, estimating the effects of different levels of low dialysate [Na+] on key clinical outcomes. Our analyses suggest that current levels of dialysate [Na+] in some health jurisdictions are possibly causing harm to many patients, especially given that real world populations are significantly less robust and more vulnerable than clinical trial ones. To quote a recent editorial, "more evidence needed before lower dialysate sodium concentrations can be recommended." That evidence is coming, and no further changes should be made to default customary practice until it is available.

Early use of endotoxin absorption by oXiris in abdominal septic shock: A case report.

RATIONALE: Septic shock leads to multiple organ failure and increases mortality rate. We reported a critical patient with abdominal septic shock, which was the first case successfully treated with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and a newly designed endotoxin removal device oXiris in mainland China. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 51-year-old man developed gastric ulcer perforation after resection of a benign peritoneal tumor and had a second abdominal surgery. His blood pressure decreased to 70/40 mm Hg with oliguria, requiring large doses of noradrenaline and intravenous fluid for resuscitation. The abdominal cavity was not sutured after the second open surgery due to severe abdominal infection and distention. His leukocyte count was over 30109/L, while the blood lactic acid was 12.5 mmol/L and procalcitonin (PCT) was >100 ng/mL. DIAGNOSIS: Since the bacterial culture of peritoneal exudate showed positive with Enterobacter aerogenes and Pseudomonas aeruginosa after the second surgery, and the patient had severe low blood pressure, hyoxemia and oliguria, combined with the laboratory tests results, he was diagnosed with Gram-negative related septic shock, acute kidney injury, and multiple organ dysfunction. INTERVENTIONS: CRRT with oXiris membrane was performed for 80hours and followed by AN69 ST membranes during the subsequent 27 days. Antibiotics together with other medical treatment were applied to the patient in the meantime. OUTCOMES: At the end of 80 hours treatment with oXiris, PCT of the patient had decreased to 14.52 ng/mL and lactic acid decreased to 4.2 mmol/L. The total sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score decreased from 15 to 11. Urine output steadily increased to 250 mL/h, and vital signs and blood pressure were stable without noradrenaline. At the end of the 27 days of conventional CRRT, his kidney function had completely recovered with a total sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA score) of 6. LESSONS: oXiris, with its enhanced endotoxin adsorption, appeared to accelerate improvement in organ dysfunction and ultimate survival in our patient. In critical patients with abdominal septic shock, oXiris is an important adjunctive consideration to supplement definitive source control and antimicrobial therapy.

Effect of Low-Sodium versus Conventional Sodium Dialysate on Left Ventricular Mass in Home and Self-Care Satellite Facility Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Fluid overload in patients undergoing hemodialysis contributes to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. There is a global trend to lower dialysate sodium with the goal of reducing fluid overload. METHODS: To investigate whether lower dialysate sodium during hemodialysis reduces left ventricular mass, we conducted a randomized trial in which patients received either low-sodium dialysate (135 mM) or conventional dialysate (140 mM) for 12 months. We included participants who were aged >18 years old, had a predialysis serum sodium ≥135 mM, and were receiving hemodialysis at home or a self-care satellite facility. Exclusion criteria included hemodialysis frequency >3.5 times per week and use of sodium profiling or hemodiafiltration. The main outcome was left ventricular mass index by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: The 99 participants had a median age of 51 years old; 67 were men, 31 had diabetes mellitus, and 59 had left ventricular hypertrophy. Over 12 months of follow-up, relative to control, a dialysate sodium concentration of 135 mmol/L did not change the left ventricular mass index, despite significant reductions at 6 and 12 months in interdialytic weight gain, in extracellular fluid volume, and in plasma B-type natriuretic peptide concentration (ratio of intervention to control). The intervention increased intradialytic hypotension (odds ratio [OR], 7.5; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.1 to 49.8 at 6 months and OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 0.5 to 28.8 at 12 months). Five participants in the intervention arm could not complete the trial because of hypotension. We found no effect on health-related quality of life measures, perceived thirst or xerostomia, or dietary sodium intake. CONCLUSIONS: Dialysate sodium of 135 mmol/L did not reduce left ventricular mass relative to control, despite improving fluid status. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: The Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12611000975998.

International comparison of peritoneal dialysis prescriptions from the Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (PDOPPS).

BACKGROUND: We describe peritoneal dialysis (PD) prescription variations among Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (PDOPPS) participants on continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD) and automated PD (APD; n = 4657) from Australia/New Zealand (A/NZ), Canada, Japan, Thailand, United Kingdom (UK), and United States (US). RESULTS: CAPD was more commonly used in Thailand and Japan, while APD predominated over CAPD in A/NZ, Canada, the US, and the UK. Total prescribed PD volume normalized to the surface area was the highest in Thailand and the lowest in Japan (for both APD and CAPD) and the UK (for CAPD). PD patients from Thailand had the lowest residual urine volume and residual renal urea clearance, yet achieved the highest dialysis urea clearance. Japanese patients had the lowest dialysis urea clearances for both APD and CAPD. Despite having similar urine volumes to patients in A/NZ, Canada, Japan, and the UK, US CAPD and APD patients used 2.5% and 3.86% glucose PD solutions more frequently, whereas fewer than 25% of these patients used icodextrin. Over half of the patients in A/NZ, Canada, the UK, and Japan used icodextrin, whereas it was hardly used in Thailand. Japan and Thailand were more likely to use 1.5% glucose solutions for their PD prescription. CONCLUSIONS: There are considerable international variations in PD modality use and prescription patterns that translate into important differences in achieved dialysis clearances. Ongoing recruitment of additional PDOPPS participants and accrual of follow-up time will allow us to test the associations between specific PD prescription regimens and clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

Icodextrin Versus Glucose Solutions for the Once-Daily Long Dwell in Peritoneal Dialysis: An Enriched Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and safety of icodextrin versus glucose-only peritoneal dialysis (PD) regimens is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare once-daily long-dwell icodextrin versus glucose among patients with kidney failure undergoing PD. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), enriched with unpublished data from investigator-initiated and industry-sponsored studies. SETTING & STUDY POPULATIONS: Individuals with kidney failure receiving regular PD treatment enrolled in clinical trials of dialysate composition. SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES: Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, Ichushi Web, 10 Chinese databases, clinical trials registries, conference proceedings, and citation lists from inception to November 2018. Further data were obtained from principal investigators and industry clinical study reports. DATA EXTRACTION: 2 independent reviewers selected studies and extracted data using a prespecified extraction instrument. ANALYTIC APPROACH: Qualitative synthesis of demographics, measurement scales, and outcomes. Quantitative synthesis with Mantel-Haenszel risk ratios (RRs), Peto odds ratios (ORs), or (standardized) mean differences (MDs). Risk of bias of included studies at the outcome level was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs. RESULTS: 19 RCTs that enrolled 1,693 participants were meta-analyzed. Ultrafiltration was improved with icodextrin (medium-term MD, 208.92 [95% CI, 99.69-318.14] mL/24h; high certainty of evidence), reflected also by fewer episodes of fluid overload (RR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.24-0.78]; high certainty). Icodextrin-containing PD probably decreased mortality risk compared to glucose-only PD (Peto OR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.24-1.00]; moderate certainty). Despite evidence of lower peritoneal glucose absorption with icodextrin-containing PD (medium-term MD, -40.84 [95% CI, -48.09 to-33.59] g/long dwell; high certainty), this did not directly translate to changes in fasting plasma glucose (-0.50 [95% CI, -1.19 to 0.18] mmol/L; low certainty) and hemoglobin A1c levels (-0.14% [95% CI, -0.34% to 0.05%]; high certainty). Safety outcomes and residual kidney function were similar in both groups; health-related quality-of-life and pain scores were inconclusive. LIMITATIONS: Trial quality was variable. The follow-up period was heterogeneous, with a paucity of assessments over the long term. Mortality results are based on just 32 events and were not corroborated using time-to-event analysis of individual patient data. CONCLUSIONS: Icodextrin for once-daily long-dwell PD has clinical benefit for some patients, including those not meeting ultrafiltration targets and at risk for fluid overload. Future research into patient-centered outcomes and cost-effectiveness associated with icodextrin is needed.

The benefit of early survival on PD versus HD-Why this is (still) very important.

There are a number of misconceptions around the identified early survival benefit of peritoneal dialysis (PD) relative to hemodialysis (HD), including that such benefits "even out in the end" since the relative risk of death over time eventually encompasses 1.0 (or even an estimate that is unfavorable to PD); that the early benefit is, in fact, most likely due to unmeasured confounding; and such benefits are only due to the influence of central venous catheters and "crash starters" in the HD group. In fact, the early survival benefit results in a substantial gain of patient life years in PD cohorts relative to HD ones, even if it the benefit appears to "even out in the end," is relatively insensitive to unmeasured confounding, and persists even when the effects of central venous catheters are accounted for. In this review, the calculations and arguments are made to support these tenets. Survival on dialysis is still one of the most important considerations for all stakeholders in the end-stage kidney disease community, including patients who rank it among their top priorities. Shared decision-making is a fundamental patient right and requires both balanced information and an iterative mechanism for a consensual decision based on shared understanding and purpose. A cornerstone of this process should be an explicit discussion of the early survival benefit of PD relative to HD.

Haemodialysis withdrawal in Australia and New Zealand: a binational registry study.

BACKGROUND: Withdrawal from dialysis is an increasingly common cause of death in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). As most published reports of dialysis withdrawal have been outside the Oceania region, the aims of this study were to determine the frequency, temporal pattern and predictors of dialysis withdrawal in Australian and New Zealand patients receiving chronic haemodialysis. METHODS: This study included all people with ESKD in Australia and New Zealand who commenced chronic haemodialysis between 1 January 1997 and 31 December 2016, using data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry. Competing risk regression models were used to identify predictors of dialysis withdrawal mortality, using non-withdrawal cause of death as the competing risk event. RESULTS: Among 40 447 people receiving chronic haemodialysis (median age 62 years, 61% male, 9% Indigenous), dialysis withdrawal mortality rates increased from 1.02 per 100 patient-years (11% of all deaths) during the period 1997-2000 to 2.20 per 100 patient-years (32% of all deaths) during 2013-16 (P < 0.001). Variables that were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of haemodialysis withdrawal were older age {≥70 years subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 1.77 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.66-1.89]; reference 60-70 years}, female sex [SHR 1.14 (95% CI 1.09-1.21)], white race [Asian SHR 0.56 (95% CI 0.49-0.65), Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander SHR 0.83 (95% CI 0.74-0.93), Pacific Islander SHR 0.47 (95% CI 0.39-0.68), reference white race], coronary artery disease [SHR 1.18 (95% CI 1.11-1.25)], cerebrovascular disease [SHR 1.15 (95% CI 1.08-1.23)], chronic lung disease [SHR 1.13 (95% CI 1.06-1.21)] and more recent era [2013-16 SHR 3.96 (95% CI 3.56-4.48); reference 1997-2000]. CONCLUSIONS: Death due to haemodialysis withdrawal has become increasingly common in Australia and New Zealand over time. Predictors of haemodialysis withdrawal include older age, female sex, white race and haemodialysis commencement in a more recent era.

Treatment of lead and arsenic poisoning in anuric patients - a case report and narrative review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Heavy metal poisoning can cause debilitating illness if left untreated, and its management in anuric patients poses challenges. Literature with which to guide clinical practice in this area is rather scattered. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of symptomatic lead and arsenic poisoning from use of Ayurvedic medicine in a 28-year-old man with end-stage kidney disease on chronic hemodialysis. We describe his treatment course with chelating agents and extracorporeal blood purification, and review the relevant literature to provide general guidance. CONCLUSION: Cumulative clinical experience assists in identifying preferred chelators and modalities of extracorporeal blood purification when managing such patients. However, a larger body of real-world or clinical trial evidence is necessary to inform evidence-based guidelines for the management of heavy metal poisoning in anuric patients.

Hemofilter with Adsorptive Capacities: Case Report Series.

BACKGROUND: oXiris is a blood purification product that has been launched recently in China. In addition to renal function support and fluid management capabilities, it can also adsorb cytokines and endotoxins. This may complement standard treatment for septic acute kidney injury (AKI) patients to control the amplitude of systemic inflammatory response responsible for acute tissue and organ damage. Objectives of our study are to elucidate characteristics of septic AKI patients who respond to treatment with oXiris and to describe the performance of oXiris through patient cases in the absence of large randomized trials on clinical use of oXiris for septic AKI patients in China. SUMMARY: Here, we present 4 cases managed in intensive care units of major hospitals in China. Key practical aspects from an expert meeting discussing these cases have been included as guidance for the use of oXiris in septic AKI patients. Key Messages: Based on the experience gathered from 4 cases, oXiris should be used early in the treatment of septic AKI patients as an adjuvant therapy with good infection source control. It should not be used to delay or replace infection source control. These cases also demonstrated that patients with high risk of bleeding can use oXiris without additional anticoagulation for up to 36 h without implications on serum protein levels and platelet count. Short of definitive biomarkers to gauge the ideal blood purification initiation and discontinuation time for septic AKI patients, clinical judgment is key to determining optimal use of oXiris in septic AKI patients.

Recruitment and participant baseline characteristics in the dialysis outcomes in those aged 65 years or older study.

BACKGROUND: Despite an increasing number of older people commencing dialysis the impact of dialysis on their quality of life and survival, remains unclear. The Dialysis Outcomes in those aged over 65 years or older study is an accelerated prospective cohort longitudinal design study, designed to obtain sufficient health related quality of life data, linked to clinical data, to inform clinicians' and patients' decision-making with respect to end stage kidney disease (ESKD), outcomes, and options for management in New Zealand (NZ). METHODS: The study has an accelerated prospective cohort longitudinal design, comprised of cross-sectional and longitudinal components. We report the baseline data on the 225 participants enrolled in the study. Dialysis duration was grouped in tertiles from less than one year (incident patients), 1-3 years and greater than 3 years. Health related quality of life data was obtained from self-reported questionnaires including KDQoL-36, EQ-5D-3 L, FACIT, WHODAS II, and the Personal Well-being Score. RESULTS: The median age of the cohort was 71 years and two thirds were male. Three quarters of the participants were on dialysis at the baseline, with 42% of those on home dialysis (haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis). Maori and Pacific people were over represented (20% Maori and 24% Pacific) in the sample, when compared to the general NZ population of the same age group (where 5% are Maori and 2% are Pacific). At baseline, there were no differences observed in sociodemographic, quality of life or health characteristics between the dialysis groups either by modality or duration of dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: We report the baseline characteristics of participants enrolled prospectively into a longitudinal cohort observational study examining health related quality of life factors with clinical characteristics on dialysis outcomes in a group of New Zealanders aged 65 years or older who are either on dialysis or have been educated about dialysis (BMC Nephrol 14:175, 2013). Subsequent publications are planned, analysing the prospective longitudinal data to identify key factors that determine both outcome and quality of life for individuals of this age group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12611000024943 .

Relationship between estimated glomerular filtration rate and incident cardiovascular disease in an ethnically diverse primary care cohort.

AIM: To investigate eGFR as an independent risk factor for CVD in a New Zealand primary care cohort, stratified by disease status (prior CVD, diabetes or no CVD or diabetes). METHOD: The PREDICT-CVD open cohort study is a large, ethnically diverse, New Zealand primary care cohort, generated by using a web-based CVD risk assessment tool. Using encrypted identifiers, participant profiles were linked anonymously to a regional laboratory database (to determine renal function) and to national hospitalisation and mortality datasets. Analyses using a single baseline eGFR measurement were undertaken in three clinical sub-cohorts of participants: those with prior CVD (n=29,742), with diabetes (n=44,416) and with neither CVD nor diabetes (n=192,696). The association between baseline eGFR (by category ≥90, 60-89.9, 30-59.9, and <30ml/min/1.73m2) and incident CVD was analysed with Kaplan Meier plots and Cox regression models. RESULTS: After adjustment for traditional CVD risk factors, there was an inverse relationship between CVD risk and eGFR, up to an eGFR of 60ml/min/1.73m2 in all three clinical sub-cohorts, and up to an eGFR of 90ml/min/1.73m2 in the sub-cohort with CVD or diabetes. Compared to eGFR ≥90ml/min/1.73m2, the adjusted hazard ratios of a new CVD event for eGFR <30ml/min/1.73m2 in the CVD, diabetes and no CVD/no diabetes sub-cohorts were 2.29 (95% CI 2.00-2.61), 4.71 (3.92-5.67) and 2.78 (2.05-3.77), respectively. Compared to European/Other ethnic groups, Maori participants remained at greater adjusted risk of a new CVD event in all clinical sub-cohorts and Pacific people only in the no CVD/no diabetes sub-cohort, whereas Indian participants had a similar adjusted risk to European/Other, and Other Asian patients were consistently at lower adjusted risk. Sensitivity analyses for individuals with consecutive eGFR results (>90 days apart) yielded similar results. CONCLUSION: This study has confirmed that, in a large ethnically diverse primary care cohort, eGFR is a significant independent predictor of CVD risk, and the risk varies by ethnic group.